Immigration Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Immigration - Research Paper ExampleSacco and Vanzetti moved from Italy to the United States at different times, further later united through anarchy related revolutionary activities (Carnevale 213). Immigration practices at the time are noteworthy different from todays intervention of the same issue. Immigration of persons at the time was not as strict as todays. On the same token, there are some immigration practices that were then highly observed, but have off-key out to be invalid or irrelevant in the contemporary society. Prior to addressing this issue, it is important to look that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted and later executed following murder charges for which they were found guilty. Prosecution undertakings were at the time influenced by more than justice pursuit. For this reason, the conviction and execution of Sacco and Vanzetti remains contentious to date. There are massive immigrant concerns that remain persistent in todays society, just as they were during th e Sacco and Vanzetti time. The interest here is to high swooning immigrant concerns that have turned to be irrelevant or invalid in current times. The world society has evolved and revolutionized throughout the years. During this time, there have been a series of changes that immigrant practices have experienced. In the Sacco and Vanzetti story, there is a persistent concern of injustices against immigrants. Sacco and Vanzetti trial, conviction, and execution were marred by prejudice against their background and country of origin. As earlier mentioned, Sacco and Vanzetti had emigrated from Italy to the United States (Carnevale 213). In the light of the crime they were aerated with, the fact that they were immigrants had to count in their trial. In other words, their innocence or guilt was informed by their race. The jury that tried them matt-up compelled and pressured by the Red Scare, and went ahead to convict them without substantial evidence that they had actually committed the c ited murders. Their involvement in revolutionary pursuits that were informed by anarchism further do their case even worse. Immigrants engage in numerous activities in the host country, some of which are legal and others illegal. According to immigration laws, immigrants are expected to amaze to the laws and regulations of the host country, failure to which they are prosecuted within the existing legal system in the host country (Carnevale 229). Today, when immigrants engage in criminal activities, they are charged just like any other person in the country they reside, and in pursuit of justice. The practice that immigrants nationality influences evidence to committing or not committing a crime no longer holds to be valid today. It is an irrelevant practice that has faded away with time due to diversity, interaction, and interdependence of countries around the world. Immigration in the 1900s was associated with economic benefits to the host country. In other words, inward migratio n of persons to new territories was informed an added advantage to the country that hosted the immigrants. This was actually the case in the United States relative to the Sacco and Vanzetti case. Immigrants that were melodic theme to be of no economic benefits to the host countries were turned away. They were only accepted in the event that they would benefit the host country. Today, this aspect has changed. In most cases, it does not even count as the reason for accepting inward immigrants in