John F. Kennedy – the Speaker

I lead privy F. Kennedy to pull through intimately as he epitomizes a great speaker to me. As I learned in class and in nurture the textbook, credibility is chance on for any speaker to be fully respected. I believe that bottom F. Kennedy non only meets this qualification but surpasses it. Over the historic period I contribute looked at his oration methodology and tried to follow his direction in communicate with knowledge, truth, and having the credibility on the subject matter. After world sworn into arrive atice, one of the best de bearryes was given by privy F.Kennedy on January 20, 1961. His inauguration speech gripped the solid republic, and it was so powerful that population still quotation mark it to this day. It is one of the sterling(prenominal) speeches of all time that was invariably indite. The reason so umteen passel look on quotes from this speech word for word is that there is a strong reaction to the pathos, ethos and logos in the people wh o hear it. John F. Kennedy was the join States thirty fifth destiny president. He received his undergraduate degree from Harvard and whence entered the Navy.He started out as a newsperson before he entered politics. After wards he wrote the Pulitzer laurels lovely Profiles in Courage. Beca purpose Kennedy was the youngest president to analyze office, he faced much skepticism from his critics. This speech gave him recognition that was positive, although it had many purposes. In order to assist the public of America to be adopt actively obscure with their country is why the world-class address was written (Goldzwig & Dionisopoulos, 1995). Evident byout John F. Kennedys speech is thrust that is youthful.Even though he just win a difficult campaign, his focus was non on the policies that contributed to his victory. The objectives he has be shown in powerful appeals to emotion, with establishing a link with the common Ameri back tooth citizen. bill of exchange from his p ast but focusing on his future, he is able to personalize his speech (Boller, 1967). Kennedys words focal meridian his active design of uniting two circumstanceious camps. He discusses the great responsibilities he carries as a president and worldwide symbol of stillness, and toward the end of his speech, he says I do not shrink from this state I get it. His listeners are allowed to hear the effectiveness of this determination from the showing of his persistence as a leader. His stance is that the world offer only be bettered by accumulated effort indeed he extends his energies to everyone. When he places the focus on what keep be done for the solving of the problem, the activism in his speech butt end be seen very clearly. His final aim for peace between debatable forces becomes obvious with his idea to, have strong power to eliminate other nations with realize control of every nations. Comp permite emphasizes the bold wording applied to his speech, and it unites ze ugma. He knows that people are xenophobic of this world, and he repre displaces the boldness to let them know psyche is available that is not scared to have a peace negotiation (Barnes, 2005). Some of Kennedys appeals that were the best to the listening were created by the diction that was metaphorical. An warning of such use of metaphor is his vow to southern nations to assist bighearted men and free establishments in casting off the chains of poverty. Here, his metaphor not only clarifies his goal of liberation but emphasizes that freedom means not repeating historical injustices. He speaks of evil tyrants in history stating, Those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside, plainly illustrating his plans of becoming a moral jut on the international level. Formal diction evokes a sense of national pride, e redundantly by respectfully referring to past Americans as forebears. In the beginning time he ingeniously cry (out)s upon other citize ns and addresses lots of government types.He places the Americans on course with the others spoken about (Heath, 1976). Kennedy does not drag on too considerable on a point, which is allowed with his use of paragraphs that are short, and some(prenominal) cases paragraphs that are composed of one sentence. His short rhetorical questions, applicable to almost anybody, make his speeches appeal to a great deal of people. A choice example of these short questions is, Will you join us in this historic effort? , which was intended to bring individuals together against a common enemy, but longer and more intricate sentences are more common in this speech.Incongruous remarks such as the famous study not what your country can do for you-ask what you can do for your country, are visible all over, and they trim well in making his intended points. These sentences are characteristic of his use of parallelism, where he lists many key ideas to make one long sentence (Liebovich, 2001). Kenned y readys utility of declarative sentences to convey his strength. An example of this includes, to those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, as well as, to those people in huts and villages across the globe. By repeating these declarations, he makes it appear as if he will definitely implement his plan. A good part of his speech is to call people into action. He uses exhortation sentences, such as his mentions of let both sides that show his collaborative approach. He dust with his active approach with the use of sentences in the imperative mood however, the humility shows through in these calls to action. He tells citizens to come up, themselves, with ways to help.The use of antithesis in writing is seen through the skillful arrangement of sentences, where he depression says what not to do and follows up with a statement of what must(prenominal) take place. He effectively groups ideas together when rhetorically necessary, such as his description of mans comm on bark against, tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself. As Kennedy shows, strong points require unwaveringly diction and plain occasionally backwards syntax. Soviets sent the set-back man out to space on April 26, 1961. This success was used by Khrushchev as prime evidence of the superiority of communism over indulgent capitalism.Ashamed, the US worried it was behind the Russians and not winning the race to get into space. After speaking with governmental types and NASA workers, Kennedy thought the US should bravely go frontwards and put a man on the moon. The United States, later this feat, would not only surpass the Soviet Union by far, but, in the words of Neil Armstrong, do one giant leap for human benigns knowledge of cognizance and space. And by the end of the 60s, it would be mission accomplished. Kennedy great deal timeline for its success and was straightforward and strong with his goal that was ambitious.By offering a notable speech implore Americans to p ut the effort in to be the first to put a man on the moon, Kennedy contributed a huge force towards the success of this space exploration program goal (Heath, 1976). Kennedy stated, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before the decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. Kennedy also said, at the time of the Berlin wall problem, on the whole free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Berlin, and therefore as a free man, I take pride in the words Ich bin ein Berliner (I am a Berliner). Finally, but of equal importance, we can view his speaking and leading talents working, at the Cuban Missile crisis where U-2 jets discovered that the Soviet Union were restfully giving Cuba missiles. President Kennedy decided to employ a naval blockade (Barnes, 2005). All ships of any kind bound for Cuba will, if found to contain cargo of dysphemistic weapons, be turned back. The greatest service he do was laying the foundation for passing a civil rights bill that gave all Americans equal rights.For this to be a reality, black America fought very hard. Speeches John F. Kennedys knack for the spoken word was unrivalled. His rhetorical ascendance coupled with a dosage of the capital of Massachusetts accent wrap ups to inspire and influence speechwriters decades later. Kennedy magnificent speeches made interesting watching and listening. The moving speeches that played a central role in his candidacy and eventual(prenominal) presidency were written in team sensory system by one Ted Sorenson. Ted Sorenson, who was Kennedys close advisor, did not work in isolation as he incorporated a team of brilliant writers.Phrases authored by Sorenson captured the imagination of a generation which are highlighted in his book-Counsellor- that looks at the attributes of Kennedy as a communicator. John F. Kennedys life was rich with memorable moments that provided fodder for his speechwriters to frame the m emorable speeches. Such moments include his heroics in the war front, clinching the senate seat and rising to the presidency. His dazzling speeches gave his ever subtile audience the feeling that they knew him. Kennedy had the audience eager and gravid to hear his speech even before he uttered a word.Barrack Obama oratorical abilities are similar to those of John F. Kennedy. Ted Sorenson Legendary speechwriter, Theodore Chaikin Ted Sorensen was born in May 8, 1928. Sorenson, who President Kennedy referred to as an intellectual business bank is of advocator at the law unswerving of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. Sorensen is synonymous with John F. Kennedys speeches, counsel and adviser. He effectively played the role of John F. Kennedy counsel and adviser and most importantly was the decorator of his spellbinding speeches.He coined the phrase that exhorted listeners to Ask not what your country can do for you ask what you can do for your country in Kennedys fore most speech. Sorensen states that although he was pivotal in the composition of the inaugural speech the phrase that became a clarion call of the Kennedy administration was written by Kennedy himself contrary to what many believe. Sorensens entry to foreign policy was necessitated after the debacle that was the Bay of Pigs when the President asked him to take part in the discussion.He was handy in solution the Cuban Missile Crisis, assisting in preparing John F. Kennedy agreement with Nikita Khruschev. He initially served as a special counsel and advisor in charge of the home(prenominal) agenda. Following the assassination of Kennedy, Sorensen helped Lyndon B. Johnson who succeeded John F. Kennedy, in his first few months, according to LBJ memoirs. He authored Lyndon B. Johnsons world-class speech to the congress and also his state of the fusion address. He departed to the White House to write John F. Kennedy history that was published in 1965.The biography that went on to bec ome an international bestseller and was subsequently translated to several(prenominal) languages illuminating the life and times of John F. Kennedy in the White House. A Legacy John F. Kennedy is attribute with minimal legislative accomplishment. Although he was the brainchild of the frontier legislation of the civil rights action, he did not live to see it materialize. John F. Kennedys aspirations, spirit, lineage, and perceived strengths continue to inspire people across the world and leading who want to emulate his oratorical skills.Kennedys mastery in the art of speaking was helped by the fact that he was not bitter. He would occasionally point for effect. He effectively used these public speaking basics. John F. Kennedy remains a phenomenal even today with politicians from all political spectrum and business leaders across the continent listening to his speech structures and delivery. ? REFERENCES Barnes, J. A. (2005). John F. Kennedy on Leadership The Lessons and Legacy of a President. tender York AMACOM. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from Questia database http//www. questia. com/PM. qst? =o=111448711 Boller, P. F. (1967). Quotemanship The Use and Abuse of Quotations for Polemical and different Purposes. Dallas, TX Southern Methodist University Press. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from Questia database http//www. questia. com/PM. qst? a=o=10910248 Goldzwig, S. R. , & Dionisopoulos, G. N. (1995). In a Perilous Hour The Public wrap up of John F. Kennedy. Westport, CT Greenwood Press. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from Questia database http//www. questia. com/PM. qst? a=o=35345061 Heath, J. F. (1976). disco biscuit of Disillusionment The Kennedy-Johnson Years.Bloomington, IN Indiana University Press. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from Questia database http//www. questia. com/PM. qst? a=o=84371896 Liebovich, L. W. (2001). The Press and the Modern Presidency Myths and Mindsets from Kennedy to Election 2000. Westport, CT Praeger. Retrieved November 12, 2009 , from Questia database http//www. questia. com/PM. qst? a=o=101157275 Simon Maier and Jeremy Kourdi. (1999). The 100 Insights and lessons from 100 of the greatest speeches ever delivered. Retrieved from http//www. leadershipexpertise. com/resources/The %20100%20Excerpts. pdf